Again, I'll always accept any decision.
Now is the Watcher partly rugose and partly squamous then? :)
From: pinlighter@btconnect.com
To: bidavids@hotmail.com;
eira.sms@virgin.net
Subject: Re: Night land : Sea of images: Plan
'A'.
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 15:52:30 +0000
On drawing the Watcher: I agree with SMS.
I can't see how
what is actually an altering reality can be trapped in
the narrow focus of an illustration.
There is too much to do in one picture - show
Palin, show Meyr, show their relationship,
and somehow also indicate they are on the skin of a
gravity- and time-warping entity too
large to picture.
This doesn't rule out drawing Meyr and Palin
on the Watcher, of course: it's just that the
Watcher can't really appear except in the form of a
tiny fragment backgrounding the action.
(I hate it when people
second-guess my thought processes, but I wonder, Brett, if you
are
not perhaps applying some of the rules of film to this
different medium?? But OTOH this
background fragment of the Watcher may be close to what you are suggesting in your last)
One point that is probably made irrelevant by the
above is that I've always regarded
Fabian's illustrations of the Watchers and
particularly the South Watcher as canonical:
so far as that can be
meaningful in a much later era when they have developed such
force they can no longer be directly viewed by human
beings. Just a referent for things
like images seen on background viewscreens,
etc.
On drawing the Watcher: I agree with SMS.
I can't see how
what is actually an altering reality can be trapped in
the narrow focus of an illustration.
There is too much to do in one picture - show
Palin, show Meyr, show their relationship,
and somehow also indicate they are on the skin of a
gravity- and time-warping entity too
large to picture.
This doesn't rule out drawing Meyr and Palin
on the Watcher, of course: it's just that the
Watcher can't really appear except in the form of a
tiny fragment backgrounding the action.
(I hate it when people
second-guess my thought processes, but I wonder, Brett, if you
are
not perhaps applying some of the rules of film to this
different medium?? But OTOH this
background fragment of the Watcher may be close to what you are suggesting in your last)
One point that is probably made irrelevant by the
above is that I've always regarded
Fabian's illustrations of the Watchers and
particularly the South Watcher as canonical:
so far as that can be
meaningful in a much later era when they have developed such
force they can no longer be directly viewed by human
beings. Just a referent for things
like images seen on background viewscreens,
etc.